After attending the panel discussion "Collaborative
Curating,” I have expanded my definitions of "creative” and "collaborative” in
the museum context. Structured in a narrative based format, the panelists
shared their collaborative projects ranging from a city-wide print mania
celebration in Philadelphia to a hands-on project between a curator and a
neuroscientist in hopes of exploring the sensory experience of handling
objects. Don’t worry no one will be handing the real thing in the exhibition.
Most interestingly, the projects discussed by the panelists were so innovative
that had you walked blindly into the auditorium, you could have easily thought
you were attending instead the panel entitled "Looking forward Ten Years: What
is the Museum of 2021.” Shelley Langdale, Adriana Proser, Sarah Schroth,
Joaneath Spicer, and Cynthia Burlington recounted a diversity of endeavors that
shared a common theme—leverage relationships and partnerships in order to
creatively engage and educate the visitor in innovative ways.
Some projects, such as Shelley Langdale’s Philagrafika 2010
involving countless Philadelphia institutions, were certainly beyond the scope
of most small institutions, especially those with staff limitations. So as a
curator who is also the collections manager, exhibition designer, preparator,
registrar, and sometimes honorary member of other departments at HCF, I
immediately recognized that these projects appeared beyond the scope of my
institution. I even found myself asking myself how are these projects relevant to
me, and then I had the "Aha moment.” That was not the point! I was being too
self-focused and had to step back and ask instead--what was the central thread
present in each of the talks. It all boiled down to the power of collective
action and where that can take cultural institutions. I was certainly inspired,
and although I may not have the opportunity to team up with a neuroscientist in
the near future, I completely understand the need for stepping outside of our
curatorial bubble and expanding what collaboration means. Partnership is
clearly the most effective method of remaining relevant, leveraging
increasingly diminished resources, and engaging a broader audience. So the type
of "Collaborative Curating” espoused in this panel is indeed "looking forward
ten years.”
Brandy S. Culp
Curator
Historic Charleston Foundation